<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes it&#8217;s OK to cheat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tbrdr.com/sometimes-its-ok-to-cheat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tbrdr.com/sometimes-its-ok-to-cheat/</link>
	<description>The Bathroom Door Rule - Your Online Dating and Relationship Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 19:55:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A girl who chooses reason over faith...yes, we do exist</title>
		<link>http://www.tbrdr.com/sometimes-its-ok-to-cheat/#comment-1135</link>
		<dc:creator>A girl who chooses reason over faith...yes, we do exist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2011 07:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbrdr.com/dating/sometimes-its-ok-to-cheat/#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>Although I appreciate Postboy&#039;s honesty, I question his motives and am not convinced of his loyalty, since he openly admitted to getting handjobs from a professional and having cybersex regularly in an earlier comment. The issue at this point is less about his strange definition of &quot;cheating&quot; and more about willful deception of his girlfriend if he keeps these things secret. If she is aware of your actions and OK with them, by all means go out and pay a sex slave disquised as a massuse to spank it for you.

In response to James, I think you&#039;re my new hero! I have always believed lifetime monogamy was unnatural. If it were in sync with nature and our biological makeup, other creatures would be doing it too, but other animals don&#039;t pass judgment on their instincts. They just follow them. Humans are cursed with a brain just advanced enough to make us think we know better than natural law. 

Society and the church have done an excellent job of convincing people that their instincts are shameful, if not outright evil. According to many religious leaders: Gays should just train themselves to be straight. Men should never lust for any woman other than their wife; and even thinking about your neighbor&#039;s wife is a heinous act. Clergy should turn off all sexual desires in order to serve God more effectively. Sure, suppressing our instincts is healthy. Our clergy are molesting children and our gays are more likely to commit suicide during adolesence than any other group. It&#039;s time to stop fighting against nature and blaming ourselves for losing the battle time and time again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I appreciate Postboy&#8217;s honesty, I question his motives and am not convinced of his loyalty, since he openly admitted to getting handjobs from a professional and having cybersex regularly in an earlier comment. The issue at this point is less about his strange definition of &#8220;cheating&#8221; and more about willful deception of his girlfriend if he keeps these things secret. If she is aware of your actions and OK with them, by all means go out and pay a sex slave disquised as a massuse to spank it for you.</p>
<p>In response to James, I think you&#8217;re my new hero! I have always believed lifetime monogamy was unnatural. If it were in sync with nature and our biological makeup, other creatures would be doing it too, but other animals don&#8217;t pass judgment on their instincts. They just follow them. Humans are cursed with a brain just advanced enough to make us think we know better than natural law. </p>
<p>Society and the church have done an excellent job of convincing people that their instincts are shameful, if not outright evil. According to many religious leaders: Gays should just train themselves to be straight. Men should never lust for any woman other than their wife; and even thinking about your neighbor&#8217;s wife is a heinous act. Clergy should turn off all sexual desires in order to serve God more effectively. Sure, suppressing our instincts is healthy. Our clergy are molesting children and our gays are more likely to commit suicide during adolesence than any other group. It&#8217;s time to stop fighting against nature and blaming ourselves for losing the battle time and time again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlc</title>
		<link>http://www.tbrdr.com/sometimes-its-ok-to-cheat/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>tlc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbrdr.com/dating/sometimes-its-ok-to-cheat/#comment-669</guid>
		<description>LAST TIME I CHECKED, I&#039;M NOT A MONKEY. I EVOLVED. ANIMALS DONT REALLY HAVE FEELINGS AND A CONCIENCE. DONT GIVE ME THAT, ITS IN OUR GENES. YOU HAVE A MIND THAT CAN BE CONTROLLED. ITS CALLED SELF CONTROL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LAST TIME I CHECKED, I&#8217;M NOT A MONKEY. I EVOLVED. ANIMALS DONT REALLY HAVE FEELINGS AND A CONCIENCE. DONT GIVE ME THAT, ITS IN OUR GENES. YOU HAVE A MIND THAT CAN BE CONTROLLED. ITS CALLED SELF CONTROL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.tbrdr.com/sometimes-its-ok-to-cheat/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tbrdr.com/dating/sometimes-its-ok-to-cheat/#comment-589</guid>
		<description>Old Fashioned as you call it was New Fangled at one point. The Idea of the life-long monogamous mated-pair is not the default human position, and it has certainly not always been that way. Many societies throughout the course of history have accepted multiple partners or polygamy. In fact I would wager that if you broke it down more societies have been prone to multiple partners, or at least serial monogamy, than life-long mated couples. This idea of life-long monogamous mated couples is realtivly new compared to the idea of the Harem and the Concubine. What you are calling &quot;Old fashioned&quot; isn&#039;t really that &quot;old&quot;. 

There are plenty of standards, they just aren&#039;t your standards, THAT is what is scary, to you at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Old Fashioned as you call it was New Fangled at one point. The Idea of the life-long monogamous mated-pair is not the default human position, and it has certainly not always been that way. Many societies throughout the course of history have accepted multiple partners or polygamy. In fact I would wager that if you broke it down more societies have been prone to multiple partners, or at least serial monogamy, than life-long mated couples. This idea of life-long monogamous mated couples is realtivly new compared to the idea of the Harem and the Concubine. What you are calling &#8220;Old fashioned&#8221; isn&#8217;t really that &#8220;old&#8221;. </p>
<p>There are plenty of standards, they just aren&#8217;t your standards, THAT is what is scary, to you at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

